The industry as a whole, including Nintendo, is incredibly inconsistent with their nomenclature about re-releases. It's obviously all just marketing, and companies trying to figure out which naming convention and marketing strategy nets them the most sales for what are essentially upgraded ports. But it's pretty disingenuous to act like Sony are the only ones who do this, although perhaps I shouldn't expect better from someone who said:Why does SIE have to lie to us about the nature of this release? Why do they call it a remaster when it’s a port? Nothing wrong with a port as a port is new to someone and the IP is popular enough where it’ll probably sell.
Who would have ever guessed that someone on a Nintendo oriented board would prefer Nintendo gameplay oriented games over SIE sad dad grimdark walking simulator cutscene fest # 63?