New official trailer
New official trailer
more trailers
4 in total
The game looks amazing, may be the best looking Switch game of the year
Mario Tennis Aces: 75MCI’m not sure that is saying much. Either way I’m interested in what the review scored will be for this.
I’m not sure that is saying much. Either way I’m interested in what the review scored will be for this.
As a comparison:Mario Tennis Aces: 75MC
Mario Golf Super Rush: 70MC
I expect it to be higher than both even if it’s only due to the better animations and ‘charisma’ of the game , I think it will be in the 77-79 range
Mario Tennis Aces deserves betterMario Tennis Aces: 75MC
Mario Golf Super Rush: 70MC
I expect it to be higher than both even if it’s only due to the better animations and ‘charisma’ of the game , I think it will be in the 77-79 range
more trailers
4 in total
The game looks amazing, may be the best looking Switch game of the year
I’m not sure that is saying much. Either way I’m interested in what the review scored will be for this.
Still pretty uncertain about this. I don't like soccer, but it looks pretty fun...just worried about the content. Is there enough non-online content to keep me busy? I just had two kids, so it's hard to be absolutely locked in against someone online for more than a couple of minutes. Is there enough variety and depth to make each match feel different, or will they all start to feel the same? I know, there aren't answers there yet...it's intriguing.
Yeah I think it's very clear this game will focus more on the competitive team setup, especially considering it is literally called 'Battle League'.Charged had a very high skill ceiling. From the looks of it, I think Battle League's lack of character diversity except for stats & gear will lead to less variety in 1x1 matches but it should be very very competitive & strategic in 4x4. The 'Bash' move to your team mates is a nice addition too. Charged was very broken, I'm just concerned Battle League sacrificed some mechanical depth for the sake of competitive balance.
Why are Nintendo sports games always scored this low? I play them and never see anything wrong with them that deserves these scores, they should atleast be in the 8’s minimum for the polish and no bugsAs a comparison:
Super Mario Strikers (GC) - 76 MC
Mario Strikers Charged (Wii) - 79 MC
Scores are made up numbers for nerds to feel better and in no way reflect how enjoyable the game is.Why are Nintendo sports games always scored this low? I play them and never see anything wrong with them that deserves these scores, they should atleast be in the 8’s minimum for the polish and no bugs
Still doesn’t explain the always average scoresScores are made up numbers for nerds to feel better and in no way reflect how enjoyable the game is.
Maybe I am biased because the stuff I am going to mention is basically what I want the most out of these Mario sports games, but I feel they would get better scores if they had more full-fledged single-player experiences and other modes.Still doesn’t explain the always average scores
Nerds don't like sports.Still doesn’t explain the always average scores
I don’t really understand your obsession with those scores. Critics need to score any game they play, be it a smaller scale 2D platformer or a Sony AAA title, and of course the latter will often get higher scores just because of the production value. That doesn’t mean it’s a better game or that people think it’s better per se, this is just how those review scores work. I don’t see anything bad about that as long as you know what the purpose of review scores is.Still doesn’t explain the always average scores
There’s games even smaller than mario sports games that get reviewed well, size/content has nothing to do with itI don’t really understand your obsession with those scores. Critics need to score any game they play, be it a smaller scale 2D platformer or a Sony AAA title, and of course the latter will often get higher scores just because of the production value. That doesn’t mean it’s a better game or that people think it’s better per se, this is just how those review scores work. I don’t see anything bad about that as long as you know what the purpose of review scores is.
Mario Sports Games aren’t really a favorable thing to put into that scale because they don’t offer a big single player experience or very expansive content, it’s more about some fun matches with friends. Which is fine? I never saw someone complaining about review scores for these rather small games. And if you talk about polish and quality, I think that even declined. Mario Golf Super Rush didn’t really meet expectations from a graphical standpoint is what I‘ll say.
Nerds don't like sports.