Beanstar40
Tingle
- Pronouns
- He/Him
I guess you need to make that YouTube money somehow right?
I highly doubt this, considering they sold over 20 million copies in less than a year.
You can't be serious.Especially considering TOTK released less than a year ago, and the marketing efforts has been high for the Holiday season, it it extremely low numbers compared to the evergreens during the Holiday season.
TOTK apparently doesn't sell much to new Switch owners. If Nintendo do heavy Holiday marketing for a product that doesn't sell to the target audience, it's a failure at some level.
Let's look at some numbers during the last quarter:
New Switches sold: 6.9 M
Mario Kart 8: 3.57 M (51% compared to new Switches sold)
Animal Crossing: 1.41 M (20%)
Super Smash: 1.23 M (18%)
Switch Sports: 1.71 M (25%)
TOTK: 0.78M (11%)
Another way of putting it: TOTK is not an evergreen title, but BOTW was. BOTW didn't sell that much less than TOTK during the last quarter, 7 year after its release, without any additional marketing.You can't be serious.
The games you've listed are not 50 hours adventure games, but casual and mostly multiplayer games. These are the epitome of evergreen titles.
Trying to paint Totk legs as "it's a failure at some level" when you compare it you them is baffling.
1. Botw didn't sell 20 millions in a month.Another way of putting it: TOTK is not an evergreen title, but BOTW was. BOTW didn't sell that much less than TOTK during the last quarter, 7 year after its release, without any additional marketing.
Nintendo wanted it to be numba 1This game is already among the top 50-or-so selling games of all time in just 7 months.
No person with realistic expectations could possibly be disappointed in its sales performance
They're basically just speculating, like everyone here on Fami lolMaybe don't give them a click because of shitty clickbait?
they are always like this, they don't know anything.
This is always an awful take for whatever game it's made about. Some of the most played games every year get absolutely no hype or discussion in the gamer (tm) bubble like Minecraft, Valorant, or League of Legends. Meanwhile one of the most discussed games of the past few months has been Suicide Squad, a game that's an absolute bomb but dissecting its corpse has been a favorite pass time for many.
Guess it depends of the country you're in.I haven't seen a Totk ad since like a month after it's release but saw it a ton before hand
Yes, I'm serious. The title doesn't reflect what they're saying in the video, the OP is wrong and many people who commented are only reacting to the title and not the content. Either people haven't heard their actual thoughts, or they're purposefully ignoring them.are you serious? the video title is "why nintendo is disappointed by tears of the kingdom sales"
Yes, I'm serious. The title doesn't reflect what they're saying in the video, the OP is wrong and many people who commented are only reacting to the title and not the content. Either people haven't heard their actual thoughts, or they're purposefully ignoring them.
If all we're supposed to discuss is in the title, then we shouldn't read OP's anymore either.
If the title of a video doesn't reflect what's in the video then it's a clickbait by definition.Yes, I'm serious. The title doesn't reflect what they're saying in the video, the OP is wrong and many people who commented are only reacting to the title and not the content. Either people haven't heard their actual thoughts, or they're purposefully ignoring them.
If all we're supposed to discuss is in the title, then we shouldn't read OP's anymore either.
it's still something they said, even if they contradict themselves laterYes, I'm serious. The title doesn't reflect what they're saying in the video, the OP is wrong and many people who commented are only reacting to the title and not the content. Either people haven't heard their actual thoughts, or they're purposefully ignoring them.
If all we're supposed to discuss is in the title, then we shouldn't read OP's anymore either.
I agree. If only we could do that with YouTube videos.Tbf if the thread title was totally different to the OP then a mod would probably ask them to update it...
Where have I argued that it isn't a clickbait title? Where have I encouraged clickbait? Don't put words in my mouth. And this thread isn't asking whether the title of the video is clickbait or not. I think everyone agrees it is.If the title of a video doesn't reflect what's in the video then it's a clickbait by definition.
Don't encourage clickbait.
Then still this entire thread is about 1 line out of a 20 minute video, which does not reflect it.it's still something they said, even if they contradict themselves later
a title (and thumbnail) are part of the video
I agree. I don't think Nintendo is disappointed with these numbers.While i call "doubt" on the thought that Nintendo is in any way disappointed with the game or its legs, i think Nintendo has an easy way to increase those legs, and is likely going to do just that.
The easy way: TotK will be one of those games Nintendo will advertise a "next-gen patch" or even a native Switch 2 version.
Problem solved.
They know they won't have a new mainline Zelda for at least 3-4 years (counting starting in 2024), so this is a very effective way to have Switch 2 having a "big Zelda" game early, and give the game a "pseudo BotW" situation, using the hype of a new console launch for the game.
People think that they know something, that's the problem.They're basically just speculating, like everyone here on Fami lol
Have the claimed they really "know" anything though? They used to work for Nintendo but they've never said they know exactly how Nintendo works. They've said themselves Nintendo is unpredictable lolPeople think that they know something, that's the problem.
Respectfully, that is absolutely not true and you know it. This thread made it possible to have an interesting conversation, in which you are participating, not only on the latest sales figures of Totk, on the differences between the life cycle of Totk and that of Botw, taking into account the nature respective games as well as the distinct context of their launch window.Then still this entire thread is about 1 line out of a 20 minute video, which does not reflect it.
less than a million units during peak holiday season for what many consider to be the best game this year which is also the sequel to what is often considered the best game of all time. Not saying it should've passed BOTW at this point. Not even saying that lifetime sales are a disappointment; they're clearly not. I think it's fair to have expected more for it within this timeframe.Nearly every sequel I can think of has worse legs in general. There's also a point where hitting certain targets quicker means those legs might not matter as much. It just sounds so farcical to me.
you know they didn’t get fired rightmaybe the real performance nintendo was disappointed with was kit and krystas or they would still be working there damn gottem
you know they didn’t get fired right
wild shit.Saying that two senior directors have little knowledge about sale expectations for their former employer is a wild statement at best. What is going on in this topic?
Yeah I'm sure at some point in development, Aonuma and Fujibayashi were pretty eager to move on. I wonder if any part of development felt redundant to them. or if they potentially regretted making a sequel. Idk. but I'm really excited for the future of Zelda. I think they learned a lot of lessons from these two games.Next Zelda will have legs like Botw. Totk's world was already explored and the depths had not much to offer besides the Spirit Tempel. Reversed world would have been nice. Like the opposite of rito's, Zora's etc. The caves offered really not that much either. Sky islands were not enough and mostly blessing shrines. Alot of shrines in general were blessing shrines. I don't wish the traditional Zelda games to come back. I love the new direction. It was just not really new. If it really relies on exploration but the world is the same, the magic is gone. Next Zelda game will fix that. Also they have spent to much time with the systems. Like ultra hand. They could have completely delete that and instead invest that time to give us a new world to explore. Fill the depth or the sky islands. I am sure that ultra hand took so much time away from the development.
Saying that two senior directors have little knowledge about sale expectations for their former employer is a wild statement at best. What is going on in this topic?
I'm sure that their experience at Nintendo Of America, in public relations, gives them an interesting insight into the internal corporate culture at Nintendo Of America. There's no doubt about it, and it wouldn't make sense to argue otherwise.wild shit.
they were in marketing, not PR.I'm sure that their experience at Nintendo Of America, in public relations, gives them an interesting insight into the internal corporate culture at Nintendo Of America. There's no doubt about it, and it wouldn't make sense to argue otherwise.
On the other hand, public relations have nothing to do with sales, which are two fundamentally different divisions within any big company in the world, with different jobs and skills.
I know how to cook a pizza, but that doesn't give me the relevance or legitimacy to comment on Domino's Pizza's financial strategy (yes, the choice of this specific company is absolutely voluntary).
It's perfectly legitimate to appreciate their content if you wish, and no one has the right to reproach anyone for it. To each his own. The same goes for the other way round, whether you like it or not, especially when it's part of an opinion justified by arguments and respectful of the people mentioned.
Zelda is like a weird poison that overtakes rationale for some Nintendo fans.Saying that two senior directors have little knowledge about sale expectations for their former employer is a wild statement at best. What is going on in this topic?
I find this claim very dubious, being disappointed in 20 million in less than a year?
they were in marketing, not PR.
The heck are you even talking about?Zelda is like a weird poison that overtakes rationale for some Nintendo fans.
I feel inclined to agree with Kit and Krysta's hypothesis given their former positions, and just seeing the data for myself. I'm sure Nintendo is happy with TOTK selling 20 million in such a short time, but people have to also keep in mind that Nintendo is a corporation whose goal is to maximize potential profits. The fact that the game has no legs, had online discussion disappear after a week, and won't reach the sales of the original BOTW very likely troubles the higher-ups to a certain degree.
They didn't set financial goals but there were absolutely sales targets they were expected to meet in their positions in marketing. I work as a software developer but I still know about sales goals our department has.Both PR and digital marketing were communications jobs. That's my point. Neither job involved defining a financial strategy or sales targets. And that's not a criticism, their skills were other, certainly valuable but just had nothing to do with it.