• Hey Famiboards, Episode 5 of the Famiboards Discussion Club is now live! WestEgg, Irene, and VolcanicDynamo discuss the WONDERFUL Super Mario Bros. Wonder! Check it out here!
  • Hey everyone, staff have documented a list of banned content and subject matter that we feel are not consistent with site values, and don't make sense to host discussion of on Famiboards. This list (and the relevant reasoning per item) is viewable here.

Debunked IMPORTANT: Nintendo didn't exist when the story of Castlevania 64 took place

Proven untrue

Guaraná

Koopa
s-l1600.jpg

This was a question I actually had for months in my life, so today I decided to look into it and discovered that the story of the game takes place in 1852 and as everyone here probably knows, Nintendo was founded in 1889, almost 4 decades later.

So, in case anyone else was in doubt, here's the information.
 
well that's because back then it was called Bintendo

there's no record of this because no one cared
 
0
I don’t know what’s confusing me more: the use of the debunked tag here, the tag’s existence at all, or this thread’s existence in the first place.
 
After extensive research (one wiki page), I can confirm that Nintendo does not exist during any Castlevania game except for Bloodlines and Portrait of Ruin. Aria of Sorrow and Dawn of Sorrow are still up in the air.

There is a small chance Order of Ecclesia is also post-Nintendo, since it is not specified when in the 1800's it takes place, but since Dracula was considered canon to the series by that point for some reason, that would put those stories almost back to back. Which makes no sense, but not much less sense than the book being part of the Castlevania timeline at all, I suppose.
 
After extensive research (one wiki page), I can confirm that Nintendo does not exist during any Castlevania game except for Bloodlines and Portrait of Ruin. Aria of Sorrow and Dawn of Sorrow are still up in the air.

There is a small chance Order of Ecclesia is also post-Nintendo, since it is not specified when in the 1800's it takes place, but since Dracula was considered canon to the series by that point for some reason, that would put those stories almost back to back. Which makes no sense, but not much less sense than the book being part of the Castlevania timeline at all, I suppose.
Ok this is important.
Why there's no threadmark option in this forum?
 
Please refrain from making unprompted Hitler jokes. -xghost777, Tangerine Cookie, VolcanicDynamo, meatbag
Hitler was also born that same year (1889). Coincidence?!?!
 
0


Back
Top Bottom