I'm not speculating, I'm talking about what happened and is proven. Rumors are rumors, meanwhile, that IS didn't develop a Fire Emblem installment without outside help is not a rumor. That's all I say when I note a change if ever they were able to handle the next episode on their own.
I dont think that saying that IS was helped by Koei Tecmo on Three Houses in an invention of any sort. I dont know what else to say.
I don't think the fact that IntSys has relied on outside support is really in contention. They had help, a fair bit of it even, but that in itself doesn't say a whole lot about whether they're meeting standards, whatever those standards might be.
I just see that they needed help on their most important franchise, which to my knowledge has never happened before for the main series Fire Emblem in its history. I'm just saying that we can't compare a developer like IS with an editor like EPD when it comes to outsourcing, which to my knowledge is just factual.
This is really the direction game development is going, with increased workload and increased development time for the different projects. It's the reason support studios exist (and have for some time). Especially for roles that come and go, it's often found more effective to outsource.
As a whole, the industry has become more reliant on outside support. Add in the sheer quantity of projects IntSys is managing, and it's no surprise they'd follow along this trend.
While it's moved to a looser structure over recent years, EPD
does develop games as a developer, while also utilizing outside assistance, just as it also oversees projects from outside developers, and just as it has done both for a long time.
It almost looks as though, to support its consistent output, IntSys is adopting a system more akin to that, and that in itself isn't a mark against them.
I certainly didn't expect the discussion to drift, for example, to the value of outsourcing when I was mostly talking about adjusting to technology.
Basically, one might assume changes in technology will lower development times or resource requirements, but those still keep increasing. It's similar here, in that it might not be so much a question of adjusting to technology, when all those other factors continue their trajectory industrywide. Adjusting to technology won't necessarily solve the issues at hand, at which point it becomes a question of managing these increased demands otherwise.
I think people will generally be more amiable to suggestions that this trajectory throughout the industry might not be sustainable, but IntSys' reliance on outside support is, at worst, a symptom of that and not the problem in itself.