- Pronouns
- he/him
You know whatI have considered all of the data from the past few days and I have a declaration!
I am excited to play Tears of the Kingdom on the Switch 2 on May 12th 2023
Thank you
I stand by my declaration
You know whatI have considered all of the data from the past few days and I have a declaration!
I am excited to play Tears of the Kingdom on the Switch 2 on May 12th 2023
Thank you
Okay, the draw distance actually sells me on this position. I tend to look at it as like poly counts and lighting/shading and all sorts of other things that are sorta baked into the visual style which wouldn't need crazy power for this particular game, but for a game that takes place across the sky and the visibility that'd give you of the world below, I can see where draw distance and LOD would make it a significant level above the base game. I gotcha.Strongly disagree. BOTW 2 would be a great showcase for Drake imo, with vastly enhanced resolution, draw distance, lod and 60fps.
I think the vast majority of the TotK audience, if given the choice between playing TotK on the device they already own, or paying $400 to play it on a new device with a higher framerate and draw distance, are going to choose the former. And considering low long TotK has already been in development, it might be more profitable to just position it as the last big Switch title and not delay it even further to port/optimize it for Drake.Strongly disagree. BOTW 2 would be a great showcase for Drake imo, with vastly enhanced resolution, draw distance, lod and 60fps.
Because they do the same with others special editionsWould they release the special edition before the game being launched though?
There's so much glare in those pics it's hard to make out anything exactly. But the added details (the circle pattern on top of all the images/text) on the back of the box itself would be an extra level for a fake I think.Am I the only one who thinks that zelda switch OLED looks fake? It's not copium for a drake release with ToTK, I mean it because the paint and detail on the joycon looks way lower quality compared to the past special ed. models.
If a Mario game was launching in April we would know about it already
Kind of an interesting post. I sort of doubt New Years weekend as a place to announce anything but ¯\(ツ)/¯
If Nate is right about the 2023 hardware being shelved recently ish, I guarantee that they have put a significant amount of hours into the botw 2 patch already.I think the vast majority of the TotK audience, if given the choice between playing TotK on the device they already own, or paying $400 to play it on a new device with a higher framerate and draw distance, are going to choose the former. And considering low long TotK has already been in development, it might be more profitable to just position it as the last big Switch title and not delay it even further to port/optimize it for Drake.
I think Zelda's weird date was chosen to slot the OLED into the golden week slotReupping my list of special edition release dates relative to the game:
I don't have really have any thoughts on the TotK OLED as it pertains to upgraded hardware. Just posting this in case anyone is curious.
- Splatoon 2: Same day
- MHGU: Same day (I think)
- Mario Odyssey: Same day
- Diablo III: Same day
- Pokémon LGPE: Same day
- Smash Ultimate: 35 days before
- DQXIS: One week before
- Disney Tsum Tsum Festival: Same day
- Pokémon Sword & Shield: One week before
- ACNH: One week before
- SM3DW+BF: Same day
- MHR: Same day
- Pokémon BDSP: Two weeks before
- Fortnite: 871 days later
- Splatoon 3: Two weeks before
- Pokémon SV: Two weeks before
Well, it was just a guess based on the languages used on the box.No? That's the box used in:
Benelux
Switzerland
Ireland (Republic of)
United Kingdom
Gibraltar
Among others.
Definitely the European box.
An announcement this year for sure but the release is no chance when DF has already said going by devs seems like there will be no new hardware in 2023.Zelda OLED exists for collectors and casuals and it will release a month or two before Zelda. It has no baring on new switch hardware, it's not Drake's target audience. Drake can still launch next year.
This makes sense actually. Huh.I think Zelda's weird date was chosen to slot the OLED into the golden week slot
Tbh if you look at fwd-bwd I think the shelved hardware was a weaker version of Drake. I think Drake still exists and it's coming next year despite a Zelda SE.An announcement this year for sure but the release is no chance when DF has already said going by devs seems like there will be no new hardware in 2023.
I think so, Splatoon 3 was released 2 weeks prior the game. So it definitely could be.Would they release the special edition before the game being launched though?
As far as I read, it's not from "the regular factory uncle" but someone reposted on Tieba that they found on the "web".* Hidden text: cannot be quoted. *
You're mixing up what DF said. They said - with a fairly long disclaimer that seemed to me like he was reading off a piece of paper (or at least choosing his words very carefully) - that 'according to devs' there was a mid-gen refresh that was canned...and they also said they don't see the next gen being in 2023 (which was their own speculation).An announcement this year for sure but the release is no chance when DF has already said going by devs seems like there will be no new hardware in 2023.
It doesn't look fake to me, but that doesn't mean it isn't.Am I the only one who thinks that zelda switch OLED looks fake? It's not copium for a drake release with ToTK, I mean it because the paint and detail on the joycon looks way lower quality compared to the past special ed. models.
This is by far the worst thing I have read on this threadCan everyone start posting less? Past few days have been insane lol.
I’m in the camp that ZOLED means nothing in regards to Switch 2 release. I’m not sure why so many people are coming to that conclusion. Nintendo probably won’t even market it but it’ll sell well with a much cheaper price tag than Switch 2.
I still believe there’s a solid chance of a 3D Mario launch game coinciding with the movie and with Switch 2 trailer playing before the movie. It then makes the strange May TOTK release make more sense.
April - Switch 2 + New Mario 3D Mario
May - TOTK
What a 1, 2 punch to launch the system with, and utilize the movie for the marketing. It makes the push back of the movie make more since too, it was all part of the big marketing push.
No, you're never the only one. Multiple have said this already did you post without reading any of the old posts Earlier?Am I the only one who thinks that zelda switch OLED looks fake? It's not copium for a drake release with ToTK, I mean it because the paint and detail on the joycon looks way lower quality compared to the past special ed. models.
a switch pro wouldn't get you those thingsimo those would be switch pro selling points. for switch 2 they'll want to show something totally new, and I think the long-awaited 3D Mario will be it
from what we know about Orin Nano, it's the same die as the 400mm2+ as Orin AGX. that's not going in a tabletI'm not saying the Drake revision was cancelled either.
I’m saying that I don’t know anything till more reporting comes out, but that I find the idea of a pre-Drake, non-TX1 revision more plausible than others do, and that Nvidia’s launch plan for Orin Nano makes a lot more sense if there was.
okay mr "pro vs 2 is marketing"a switch pro wouldn't get you those things
The use of a logo from a past 3ds zelda edition makes its suspiciousIt doesn't look fake to me, but that doesn't mean it isn't.
But why the hell did they use the 3DS Zelda crest on the dock instead of TotK's logo?
Also most patterns look very BotW to me.
That is a very sensical argument. Bottom line is that even if Switch 2 did launch alongside Zelda TotK, the game would still be selling in far greater numbers on OG Switch and the situation is very different from Zelda TP and Zelda BotW where those games were developed on systems that not only sold poorly, but were basically dead consoles by the time those Zelda titles were ready. Zelda TotK will be great regardless, but I cant help but feel like I will be playing it on Switch in its twilight years when I could be playing on a Drake powered Switch in its infancy.I think the vast majority of the TotK audience, if given the choice between playing TotK on the device they already own, or paying $400 to play it on a new device with a higher framerate and draw distance, are going to choose the former.
you're the one making a distinction between pro and 2 in your post. you're also the one who can't define what those are for ease of discussion, so I'm forced to assume the "2" is Drake. maybe instead of complaining about my post, you help me and define what a "pro" and what a "2" is in your eyesokay mr "pro vs 2 is marketing"
neither of them have to exist in the context of my original post. I referred to "switch pro selling points" and think it would make sense for a system branded as a successor to have a totally new game. I was not engaging in speculation of what drake (or some other other mystery chip) is capable of but instead considering their strategy in the context of "why not delay zelda further"you're the one making a distinction between pro and 2 in your post. you're also the one who can't define what those are for ease of discussion, so I'm forced to assume the "2" is Drake. maybe instead of complaining about my post, you help me and define what a "pro" and what a "2" is in your eyes
Is there any need for thisNo, you're never the only one. Multiple have said this already did you post without reading any of the old posts Earlier?
Drake still exists, and it's coming with Zelda. I still have no reason to doubt that.
you're so based...Drake still exists, and it's coming with Zelda. I still have no reason to doubt that.
You could ask the same thing about his post.Is there any need for this
I didn't say that either! This is getting into the weeds a bit, I'm not trying to argue this definitely happened. I'm just looking at possibilities. Let me walk it through.How would it make sense to use a binned chip for Nintendo?
Probably only a fifth of them could be satisfied in the first quarter if they actually all wanted to upgrade right away, so that's not a big issue.I think the vast majority of the TotK audience, if given the choice between playing TotK on the device they already own, or paying $400 to play it on a new device with a higher framerate and draw distance, are going to choose the former.
The other user was just posting their take, and "am I the only one who <blank>" is a fairly common way to frame a take. You were being unnecessarily hostileYou could ask the same thing about his post.
To be honest, I haven’t really been reading a lot of the posts because it’s kind of difficult to read at the moment. So I wouldn’t even blame them.No, you're never the only one. Multiple have said this already did you post without reading any of the old posts Earlier?
I'm on #teamreal
that makes your response even less relevant then. you could have said this instead of being an assneither of them have to exist in the context of my original post. I referred to "switch pro selling points" and think it would make sense for a system branded as a successor to have a totally new game. I was not engaging in speculation of what drake (or some other other mystery chip) is capable of but instead considering their strategy in the context of "why not delay zelda further"
Some things don't add up, but it still looks as real as it is fake.I'm on #teamreal
Kind of an interesting post. I sort of doubt New Years weekend as a place to announce anything but ¯\(ツ)/¯
If Drake were to release in 2024? Well, since I do intend to finally put together a new desktop in 2023, that would provide some time for the luxury wallet to recover. Conversely, the shock of putting down money for PC + Drake at the same time would be the one downside of a H1 2023 launch.If there is no Switch 2 with Zelda and Switch 2 comes in 2024, are there any positives which come out of that situation for you?
Wasn't it a supply/$$$ decision? TSMC's N7 is/was significantly more in demand at the time. And honestly, in hindsight, it hasn't really hindered the success of the RTX 30 series.Is this all happening because of shitty nodes that Nvidia happened to pick? Apparently a boosted Mariko was shelved due to meager improvements in performance sometime in 2018 most likely? Then it potentially could be that basing Orin on Samsung 8nm led to Nintendo being unhappy with battery life in 2021 or so? Meanwhile, NVN2 and the linux updates point to a substantially more powerful chip, so maybe they waited for Samsung to improve their low 5nm yields. And I guess we might've read too much into the numbers? I believe I noted that following the 15.0.0 FW update weirdness and comparing previous FW update timelines would place us at a March 2024 release...Hope not.
Why did Nvidia go with 8nm for Ampere? Does everything go back to that decision?
Probably not the successor of the A715 (which would be announced in ~May 2023).Yeah, by mid 2024 it would be something like an A715 or the successor to the A715.
I'll be going down with the ship. (is there a salute emoticon?)I have no regrets with my H1 2023 prediction. It was a deduction based on the available clues at the time. More clues have surface that weaken it, but that's the name of the game.
I dig the theoretical synergy too, but I get the impression that movies are a enough of a beast of complex moving parts themselves that trying to synchronize would be too difficult?I would be very surprised and kind of confused if Nintendo launches the hotly anticipated Mario movie and offers no new Mario game, port or collection in the first half of 2023. As stated elsewhere, 2022 was the lowest amount of Mario releases in 32 years. Why starve Mario gaming fans so much and then release the film and still not offer a game to buy?
I don't think we will see a new 3D Mario until 2024 at the earliest but a new 2D game, port or collection announced at the February Direct I would say is a fairly safe bet. Of course all of this is just my speculation.
Ahhh I finally understand what you're getting at.I didn't say that either! This is getting into the weeds a bit, I'm not trying to argue this definitely happened. I'm just looking at possibilities. Let me walk it through.
The original Nvidia roadmap for this year had Nano Next (not branded as Orin) launching in 2022 before Orin did. Before the Drake reveal in March, many of us speculated that Nano Next was Dane.
Late last year Nvidia moved Nano Next to after Orin on their roadmap. Orin Nano, the product we eventually got, is a floorswept Orin. In modern chip manufacturing, floorswept chips don't come before their full fat counterparts.
Why was there ever an expectation that Nano Next would launch before Orin? Did it, at one point, have a large customer with a timeline? Was it, at one point, an independent chip, rather than just a floorswept version of its Big Brother?
less relevant? if you had read the context instead of just trying to dunk on me indiscriminately I think it would've been clear we were always talking about launch strategiesthat makes your response even less relevant then. you could have said this instead of being an ass
maybe they aren't too confident in zelda. even assuming that it's an incredible masterpiece, it's a very direct sequel made at the same visual fidelity as its predecessor with seemingly very similar gameplay and the same open world. it's taken very long, I suspect due in part to the pandemic, but it's very thoroughly a switch game. in fact, it's the switch gameiest switch game we've got.
meanwhile, 3D Mario could be made to a much higher level of visual fidelity from the ground up, creating a much greater impact for switch 2.
it's going to be just as crusty as it is on switch though. it would've been perfect to sell a switch pro but I won't be surprised if the strategy is to leave it as the main switch title in the middle of next year, something else in October 2023 to June 2024 (maybe Pikmin 4 if they push it enough), and leave it all behind in holiday 2024.
Yeah I've been kinda weird about TotK being a launch game for Drake for any reason other than brand recognition. The suggestion that it'd be a showcase for the new system when it's built from a Wii U game, just seemed a little less than ideal for me. A better visual showcase would in my opinion be something like Metroid Prime, a new sandbox Mario, or...
Pikmin
(sorry for the quotes)Strongly disagree. BOTW 2 would be a great showcase for Drake imo, with vastly enhanced resolution, draw distance, lod and 60fps.
Ahhh I finally understand what you're getting at.
Was nano next always tied to Orin? Could it have been planned to be a binned Xavier or something?
LMFAOOOOOCan everyone start posting less? Past few days have been insane lol.
I’m in the camp that ZOLED means nothing in regards to Switch 2 release. I’m not sure why so many people are coming to that conclusion. Nintendo probably won’t even market it but it’ll sell well with a much cheaper price tag than Switch 2.
I still believe there’s a solid chance of a 3D Mario launch game coinciding with the movie and with Switch 2 trailer playing before the movie. It then makes the strange May TOTK release make more sense.
April - Switch 2 + New Mario 3D Mario
May - TOTK
What a 1, 2 punch to launch the system with, and utilize the movie for the marketing. It makes the push back of the movie make more since too, it was all part of the big marketing push.
You mean a switch 2, the current one is about to be 6years old.I'm just gonna be real here, if there isn't a Pro by Zelda's release I'm just going to p*rate the game and run it better on my laptop. After experiencing 1440p and 4K at 60fps, I never want to go back.
I think many people on this thread should do the same if this is what ends up happening.
I will give Nintendo money when they make a Pro