The thought that Nintendo gives a single fuck about the steam deck is so funny to me.
Imagine: an overseas company whose net worth is over 5 times higher, with their current hardware at 118+mi units sold, reaching the 3rd place in the 'best selling consoles of all time' in like a week or so. That same company, being worried about their competitor's option that by contrast to the switch is only available in a select few countries, isn't available in retail, doesn't come bundled with a dock, has poor to mediocre battery runtime on intensive 3d titles, relies on a convoluted solution for the less tech-savvy (a good chunk of nintendo gamers) to run switch titles - which is pointless anyways because you'd still get worse battery life, has a considerably worse display, no option to share controllers with a friend (L and R joycons), no tabletop mode, costs anywhere from 50 to 200$ more...
Should I even bother going on?
If the people who are still deluded about the new switch versus the steam deck even read this thread a couple pages ago, they'd know that drake, even at lower clock speeds still beats the steam deck. That's solely because the deck isn't something you'll run at it's max TDP in handheld mode if you want to actually play the thing for over an hour or so. And by utilizing the numbers we already have on drake, it's clear that the device in docked mode beats the deck as well, DLSS not even being considered.
Right now, the steam deck has a confirmed amount of over a million sales, but analytics websites using data from the steam store's page ID for the device mention about more than twice that number however, even considering the limited availability, were drake a failure, it would still sell many times more across both device's lifetime. Solely because the availability and demand for a new switch is way higher.